There is a particular kind of breathless, self-congratulatory posturing that occurs when an author who spent two decades dining out on a wildly praised 1997 debut, finally returns — not merely to tell a story, but to stage a political intervention. And so it was when Arundhati Roy delivered The Ministry of Utmost Happiness: the global literary establishment tripped over itself to praise its lush prose. As if further proof was required, it demonstrated once again that if you package Indian realities as a pained, exoticised plea for Western salvation, the international prize circuit will happily lap it up.
Before we get deeper, I must confess that I read her first almost a decade after its release. By then, there was enough of Ms Roy in the public domain to invite incision, but one had to look closely at The God of Small Things to discern that it was a stylistic exercise tailor-made to flatter the White Man’s Burden. To read her second last week — a bloated, 450-page political scrapbook — was to go from an undercurrent suspected to an undeniable shriek. Indeed, the high priestess of elite radicalism has gifted us something quite rare — a novel that manages to be simultaneously exhausting and hilarious in its unearned self-seriousness.
At one level, the arclight only serves to highlight the failings of the much-hyped, damp squib of a novel. Take, for instance, Ms Roy’s Endlösung for the staggering, blood-soaked complexities of South Asian history. Don't fall off the chair, but it appears that multi-generational border wars, deep-seated caste friction, and nuclear brinkmanship can be neatly resolved if everyone simply were to move into a Delhi graveyard, build a bohemian guest house among the tombstones, and adopt a stray dog. It is the ultimate elite, left-liberal fantasy: suggesting that opting out of the state and joining a universal commune of collective empathy is still an option, despite what the world has seen of regimes in various shades of red over the last century. This provides the moral bedrock to pass off a literal dead-end as a profound geopolitical alternative — an Aman-ki-Asha peace-piping wrapped in an expensive erudite cloak.
Ms Roy shifts her gaze to the valleys of Kashmir too, only to throw historical and strategic accountability out the window to create a comforting morality play. The state is flattened into pure villainy — an omnipotent, cartoonishly cruel machine of pure oppression — while the insurgent factions are given a tragically romantic, poetic sheen. By erasing the grinding, asymmetric realities of state-sponsored proxy warfare, cross-border terrorist networks, and the logistical nightmares of maintaining sovereign borders, she hands the reader a broken compass. The volatile geopolitical chessboard is reduced to a simplistic black-and-white melodrama designed only for Western literary prize juries to swoon in solemn approval.
The fact remains that Roy writes from the absolute pinnacle of global bourgeois privilege, and it shows in how the novel treats human misery as decorative wallpaper. It reads like a chaotic kitchen-sink catalogue of every socio-political crisis available — religious riots, environmental collapse, caste violence, military occupation — all thrown into a blender not for rigorous structural analysis, but to serve as a gritty, aesthetic backdrop for her characters' tortured emotional awakenings. The whole point is to gloss over policy mechanics and turn real-world trauma into a voyeuristic safari for the global metropolitan elite.
All told, the novel is no more than a vehicle for Ms Roy's barely-disguised political vanity. She has spent years courting controversy in the media, frequently getting into trouble for inflammatory stances and wearing it like a badge of honour. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness reflects this exact posture, with no attempt to actually interrogate how power works or how institutions function. It is a performance of moral superiority dressed up as fiction: a protracted, high-brow manifesto that offers zero answers, preferring instead to preach with theatrics. This is Brand Arundhati — courting perpetual controversy, aestheticising suffering, and revelling in classic left-liberal snobbery — who needs a plot?
In the end, there is nothing wrong with writing fairy tales, but beware this megaphone that only sits in shrill judgement, pillorying the messy machinery of statecraft and governance, and achieving little save vacuous sanctimony. Pick this one if you, like the author, can retreat into a fantasy kitchen in a graveyard, feel beautifully enlightened over sips of social justice, and pretend you have rescued the republic.
Before we get deeper, I must confess that I read her first almost a decade after its release. By then, there was enough of Ms Roy in the public domain to invite incision, but one had to look closely at The God of Small Things to discern that it was a stylistic exercise tailor-made to flatter the White Man’s Burden. To read her second last week — a bloated, 450-page political scrapbook — was to go from an undercurrent suspected to an undeniable shriek. Indeed, the high priestess of elite radicalism has gifted us something quite rare — a novel that manages to be simultaneously exhausting and hilarious in its unearned self-seriousness.
At one level, the arclight only serves to highlight the failings of the much-hyped, damp squib of a novel. Take, for instance, Ms Roy’s Endlösung for the staggering, blood-soaked complexities of South Asian history. Don't fall off the chair, but it appears that multi-generational border wars, deep-seated caste friction, and nuclear brinkmanship can be neatly resolved if everyone simply were to move into a Delhi graveyard, build a bohemian guest house among the tombstones, and adopt a stray dog. It is the ultimate elite, left-liberal fantasy: suggesting that opting out of the state and joining a universal commune of collective empathy is still an option, despite what the world has seen of regimes in various shades of red over the last century. This provides the moral bedrock to pass off a literal dead-end as a profound geopolitical alternative — an Aman-ki-Asha peace-piping wrapped in an expensive erudite cloak.
Ms Roy shifts her gaze to the valleys of Kashmir too, only to throw historical and strategic accountability out the window to create a comforting morality play. The state is flattened into pure villainy — an omnipotent, cartoonishly cruel machine of pure oppression — while the insurgent factions are given a tragically romantic, poetic sheen. By erasing the grinding, asymmetric realities of state-sponsored proxy warfare, cross-border terrorist networks, and the logistical nightmares of maintaining sovereign borders, she hands the reader a broken compass. The volatile geopolitical chessboard is reduced to a simplistic black-and-white melodrama designed only for Western literary prize juries to swoon in solemn approval.
The fact remains that Roy writes from the absolute pinnacle of global bourgeois privilege, and it shows in how the novel treats human misery as decorative wallpaper. It reads like a chaotic kitchen-sink catalogue of every socio-political crisis available — religious riots, environmental collapse, caste violence, military occupation — all thrown into a blender not for rigorous structural analysis, but to serve as a gritty, aesthetic backdrop for her characters' tortured emotional awakenings. The whole point is to gloss over policy mechanics and turn real-world trauma into a voyeuristic safari for the global metropolitan elite.
All told, the novel is no more than a vehicle for Ms Roy's barely-disguised political vanity. She has spent years courting controversy in the media, frequently getting into trouble for inflammatory stances and wearing it like a badge of honour. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness reflects this exact posture, with no attempt to actually interrogate how power works or how institutions function. It is a performance of moral superiority dressed up as fiction: a protracted, high-brow manifesto that offers zero answers, preferring instead to preach with theatrics. This is Brand Arundhati — courting perpetual controversy, aestheticising suffering, and revelling in classic left-liberal snobbery — who needs a plot?
In the end, there is nothing wrong with writing fairy tales, but beware this megaphone that only sits in shrill judgement, pillorying the messy machinery of statecraft and governance, and achieving little save vacuous sanctimony. Pick this one if you, like the author, can retreat into a fantasy kitchen in a graveyard, feel beautifully enlightened over sips of social justice, and pretend you have rescued the republic.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment